Perhaps there is some help from the tensor cores, but I don't think its tangible enough. Now if you look at this supposed tensor optimized RTX voice, again people can walk around the requirement for the tensor cores and make it work fine, or at least well enough. When this solution first came about, most reviews did find that the supposedly less elegant AMD solution seem to produce better results both in terms of performance and IQ, as compared to the first gen DLSS.
Even though AMD did not feature any machine learning cores in the chip, their solution to DLSS is simple, just lower resolution based on how much performance you want back, and sharpen the details. Nothing like a real time machine learning on our GPU to optimize performance. Turns out that games first needs to be optimized, or more like the game developer needs to work with Nvidia to "teach" the AI how it should optimize.
If you look at DLSS, when I first heard it, I thought its a great feature that the tensor cores can optimized the frames real time. The more I read about the features that "utilizes" the tensor cores, the more I feel the tensor cores are a marketing gimmick in the retail market.
Don't get me wrong I jumped over to a rx480 to move up from my 760 (got 10-15fps more) kinda got pissed at Nvidas forced log in thing just to check for updates(they no longer force you to log in ) but frankly all the chances I had to test with I got 10-20 more FPS out of the Nvida equivalent, this translates to a few more years of medium end gaming. Yes yes I know its a dumb long winded rant but not everyone is made of money more so alot of people don't bother to keep up with hardware/software compatibility/nuance. I picked up a used 1060 for 170 8 months ago and found a new 1660 for 200 a month ago for a friends computer, the 1660 knocks is getting 5-10 more FPS than the 1070's I have tested, borrowed a RX 5700 it got 5-8 more FPS than the 1660 at double the price of the 1660.ĪMD lied about the memory bandwidth on the 8 core CPUs(got my class action check) so its not like they are much better they are just a lesser evil to try and keep Intel/Nvida from slacking more. Even AMD cards get treated the same and frankly they maintain higher prices than Nvida becuse people are price gougeing.but they do that with 990fx mobos too. So you buy used or wholesale or non auth vensor discount, if a thing is just 2 or 3 times removed from authorized vendors the product can't make the producer of it any money because its already been sold and resold in the market, it dose not really matter if tis bought alot what matters is if the primary vendors sell them direct to end users. Not everything sold has a like or worth while alternatives, video cards you don t have much of a choice unless you are a minimalist.
Rtx voice alternative for amd free#
I'd say they could have ofered it free with the RTX and then asked 10-20$ for non RTX cards.īuy not buying Nvida you are shooting yourself in the foot because you are getting much less performance for the money you are putting in, unless you are not gaming.
Rtx voice alternative for amd drivers#
The whole game market is pretty much focused on Nvida more so than AMD and it helps Nivda dose more to optimize their drivers more frequently. but that dose not help you have to not buy the games that are more optimized to run on Nvida cards. They are anti competitive as well.I hate to say I really do. They are just a bunch of a-clowns when it comes to be being straight forward and honest. Instead they just lie through their G-D teeth saying it requires "Tensor cores" to promote a marketing objective which is a blatant lie. Digitalgriffin said:You know I would have respected NVIDIA more if they said, "This is a premium feature you need to pay for with a higher end RTX Card to receive"
0 kommentar(er)
